icemonky84 wrote:Hm, this is the ambassador who was fired for corruption and lawbreaking and claims to be a close associate of Assange? Yeah, there's a rock solid source. Moe's getting into ditchdigger territory of alt right silliness, it appears.
And who regularly appears on Kremlin-owned TV raving about what a good example it is of journalism.
Aww.... My little leghumper just keeps on leghumping. After all these years on ignore. Isn't that umm... Disturbing?
In any case, all I did was point out that he was the UK ambassador to Uzbekistan (a fact that the Engrish teacher failed to grasp) who had written an interesting book about his time in that country. It's not as though I've endorsed the guy or what he is quoted as saying here.
In any case, I think you'll find (if you click on my link) that I'm far from the only person who has characterized his book as interesting. You mindless and hairless angry little muppet.
What on earth causes the sort of derangement that results in you pounding away at nothing, knowing that the only hope that I'll even take note of you is for someone to quote you? Do you consider yourself mentally normal? Considered seeking help? Just saying, you might want to.
These are rhetorical questions by the way - don't bother pounding away at a response that I'm not gonna read.
You'd have thought the Dems might have questioned the coronation of Hillary when she was struggling mightily to beat a guy that most people hadn't heard of prior to this election, a guy who openly proclaimed himself a socialist. You'd think that might have been a little bit of a warning signal.