Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Sponsored by Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow
Lost Soul
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 56456
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am

Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Lost Soul » Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:10 am

From the halls of Congress two years ago.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPxMZ1WdINs

Is this guy great or is this guy great?

Mao looks like the befuddled, leftist dipshit he is; don't you agree?
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

User avatar
Godjira
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 67045
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:52 pm

Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Godjira » Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:19 am

I'll decide how great he is when I hear his health care plan and support for his arguments.

Don't be so easily fooled by rhetorical style.
That's the kind of bold flavor they enjoy in Albuquerque!

Lost Soul
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 56456
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Lost Soul » Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:22 am

Are you all right?
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

User avatar
Godjira
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 67045
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:52 pm

Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Godjira » Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:38 am

Sure. You're just gushing.

There's no actual substance.
That's the kind of bold flavor they enjoy in Albuquerque!

Cisco
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 2062
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:23 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Cisco » Sat Aug 11, 2012 4:05 pm

He has been named.

Let the demonizing begin!

User avatar
judik
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 20787
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:21 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by judik » Sat Aug 11, 2012 4:11 pm

Nightly wet dreams for Lost Soul!

Or perhaps afternoon dream sessions
You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried everything else.

Winston Churchill

Lost Soul
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 56456
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Lost Soul » Sat Aug 11, 2012 6:56 pm

judik wrote:Nightly wet dreams for Lost Soul!

Or perhaps afternoon dream sessions

Don't get too depressed, Judi.

You'll soon discover that fiscal sanity even helps Dumbocrats. Shock.
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

User avatar
Right_Turn
Evil Overlord
Posts: 6757
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 4:58 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Right_Turn » Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:20 pm

Cisco wrote:He has been named.

Let the demonizing begin!


The Dems here always shoehorn them as either stupid, evil, or an extremist.

In Ryan's case, stupid is clearly off the table. So, he's either evil or an extremist.

User avatar
Citizen Baba
Mayor McCheese
Posts: 23746
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 5:44 am

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Citizen Baba » Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:28 pm

A couple months ago Lost Soul and cisco were telling us business experience should be a requirement for becoming president.

What's changed?

Logg
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 10444
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:19 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Logg » Sat Aug 11, 2012 8:04 pm

Lost Soul wrote:From the halls of Congress two years ago.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPxMZ1WdINs

Is this guy great or is this guy great?

Mao looks like the befuddled, leftist dipshit he is; don't you agree?


I saw Obama listening intently, not looking befuddled.

This is such dry and complex stuff. There's no way to catalogue and process all the numbers Ryan is providing here. Whether or not Obama is listening intently and trying to process the information or just pretending to, you've reduced the exchange to "Is this guy great or is this guy great?" and "Mao looks like the befuddled, leftist dipshit he is."

Everything's a bar brawl to you.

Without knowing anything about this guy,I'm willing to give him consideration based on this video alone. Based on this video alone, I can tell that whatever he is, he's no Sarah Palin.

I won't hold it against him that the guy saying he's so great is the same guy who held Palin in equal esteem in 2008.

User avatar
section8
the Secret Sauce
Posts: 28623
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:46 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by section8 » Sat Aug 11, 2012 8:49 pm

Right_Turn wrote:
Cisco wrote:He has been named.

Let the demonizing begin!


The Dems here always shoehorn them as either stupid, evil, or an extremist.

In Ryan's case, stupid is clearly off the table. So, he's either evil or an extremist.


Why does it have to be either/or? Surely he is both.
This is the only musical: the mouth. And hopefully the brain attached to the mouth. Right? The brain, more important than the mouth, is the brain. The brain is much more important.

User avatar
judik
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 20787
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:21 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by judik » Sat Aug 11, 2012 8:54 pm

Having Romney and Ryan elected may show the people who voted for them that going backwards to the time of the robber barons and a two class system might not be in their best interests
You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried everything else.

Winston Churchill

demsrdumb
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 3991
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:16 am

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by demsrdumb » Sat Aug 11, 2012 11:05 pm

two class system


Huh, what kind of system are you spouting? Three? Four? One!!!! Who decides what is each class? Is there a class within each class? So in effect are you saying that two classes is bad? Or are you saying that three is better? Or that ONE class is supreme? Please tell us Judkipopov is A one class everyone the same system you deem the best?
“A tax payer voting for Obama is like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders.”

Annie Oakley = "I got nothing."

To a liberal diversity is people of different races, genders and sexual preferences, who all think the same......

User avatar
judik
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 20787
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:21 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by judik » Sat Aug 11, 2012 11:07 pm

All joking aside LS about your dreams of a three way with Ryan and Rand how do you do you reconcile the fact that Ryan voted in lockstep with other repubs for Bush policies?

Paul Ryan voted for the Iraq war.

He voted for Medicare Part D.

He voted for TARP.

He voted for the Bush Tax Cuts. Twice.

He also voted for the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008, HR 5140.


all those things are being accused of ballooning the deficit

Now apparently he says he was 'miserable " having to cast those votes but like the partisan hack he is he swallowed his principles and did it
You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried everything else.

Winston Churchill

demsrdumb
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 3991
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:16 am

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by demsrdumb » Sat Aug 11, 2012 11:08 pm

Lost Soul wrote:From the halls of Congress two years ago.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPxMZ1WdINs

Is this guy great or is this guy great?

Mao looks like the befuddled, leftist dipshit he is; don't you agree?


I dont know, befuddled, more like I hate you stinking capitalist swine. Phew.....
“A tax payer voting for Obama is like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders.”

Annie Oakley = "I got nothing."

To a liberal diversity is people of different races, genders and sexual preferences, who all think the same......

User avatar
judik
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 20787
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:21 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by judik » Sat Aug 11, 2012 11:11 pm

Huh, what kind of system are you spouting? Three?

You are dumb
Three sounds about right-lower,middle and upper
Much better than lower and upper
You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried everything else.

Winston Churchill

Cisco
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 2062
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:23 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Cisco » Sun Aug 12, 2012 12:03 am

Citizen Baba wrote:A couple months ago Lost Soul and cisco were telling us business experience should be a requirement for becoming president.

What's changed?


I made two posts on that topic.

The first was:

"I don't think Romney seriously pitched the idea. During a campaign speech, he related a conversation he had with a restaurant owner who said he would like to have such an amendment passed. It was a nice anecdote to illustrate the desirability of some business experience in a presidential candidate."

And here's the second:

"Seriously, my post was not intended to argue for or against the idea, although I think some business or management experience would certainly be very helpful. I simply intended to show that it was not Romney's idea to seek such a constitutional amendment."

Which of those posts indicate that I believe that business experience should be a requirement for becoming president?

Lost Soul
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 56456
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Lost Soul » Sun Aug 12, 2012 2:26 am

Citizen Baba wrote:A couple months ago Lost Soul and cisco were telling us business experience should be a requirement for becoming president.

What's changed?

I suggest you enroll in avalon's fast-track program for teaching reading comprehension to humanity. She does good work, cheap.

BTW, there is an Olympic runner from Ethiopia named Debaba that made me think of you.
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

Lost Soul
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 56456
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Lost Soul » Sun Aug 12, 2012 2:35 am

Logg wrote: Without knowing anything about this guy,I'm willing to give him consideration based on this video alone. Based on this video alone, I can tell that whatever he is, he's no Sarah Palin.

I won't hold it against him that the guy saying he's so great is the same guy who held Palin in equal esteem in 2008.

That's mighty white of you.

In my defense, I said Palin was great compared to idiot Biden (especially), McBane or Maobama. I also said she was too leftist for me to vote for. She still is. Alaska is still trying to correct the economic leftist destruction she began while Governor. Alone among Americans outside of Alaska, incognita got it. The utter bullshit the media sprayed about that woman really opened my eyes to what they were saying about people I didn't know so well. Palin a right-winger? Not economically.
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

Lost Soul
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 56456
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Lost Soul » Sun Aug 12, 2012 2:36 am

judik wrote:Having Romney and Ryan elected may show the people who voted for them that going backwards to the time of the robber barons and a two class system might not be in their best interests

What's wrong with going back to the time of Bubba?
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

Lost Soul
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 56456
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Lost Soul » Sun Aug 12, 2012 2:41 am

judik wrote:All joking aside LS about your dreams of a three way with Ryan and Rand how do you do you reconcile the fact that Ryan voted in lockstep with other repubs for Bush policies?

Paul Ryan voted for the Iraq war.

He voted for Medicare Part D.

He voted for TARP.

He voted for the Bush Tax Cuts. Twice.

He also voted for the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008, HR 5140.


all those things are being accused of ballooning the deficit

Now apparently he says he was 'miserable " having to cast those votes but like the partisan hack he is he swallowed his principles and did it

I agree, the man is not perfect politically, like me. But he's been singing the correct tune since Fetal Alcohol Bush got attacked by the pretzel.

Then consider the alternative: a leftist junta with utter disdain for the US, its laws and its Constitution, who would rule like Hugo or Fidel if the Congress wasn't Pubic.
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

User avatar
Godjira
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 67045
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:52 pm

Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Godjira » Sun Aug 12, 2012 3:02 am

Lost Soul vs The Truth! The smackdown!
That's the kind of bold flavor they enjoy in Albuquerque!

User avatar
judik
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 20787
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:21 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by judik » Sun Aug 12, 2012 3:17 am

Then consider the alternative: a leftist junta with utter disdain for the US, its laws and its Constitution, who would rule like Hugo or Fidel if the Congress wasn't Pubic.

You mean someone like Teddy Roosevelt who would reign in the excesses of the Randians?

but really you are such a drama queen
Both parties are beholden to corporate interests
Surprised you haven't caught on to that
You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried everything else.

Winston Churchill

User avatar
Godjira
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 67045
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:52 pm

Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Godjira » Sun Aug 12, 2012 3:23 am

He thinks it's better to be more beholden to corporate interests.
That's the kind of bold flavor they enjoy in Albuquerque!

Lost Soul
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 56456
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Lost Soul » Sun Aug 12, 2012 3:30 am

judik wrote:
Then consider the alternative: a leftist junta with utter disdain for the US, its laws and its Constitution, who would rule like Hugo or Fidel if the Congress wasn't Pubic.

You mean someone like Teddy Roosevelt who would reign in the excesses of the Randians?

What about the Bubba years? Were the 90's so awful under a Pubic Congress?

but really you are such a drama queen
Both parties are beholden to corporate interests
Surprised you haven't caught on to that

Some people are slower than others. You, for example.

As you know, I caught on to it 25 years ago. What's taking you so long to adjust your voting habits to Gary Johnson for Pres?

Anyway, in terms of relative awfulness, Ryan/Romney are much easier to digest than Mao/Biden, unless you really want to live in Mexico, Greece, Argentina or the 100 other bastions of fiscal insanity.
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

User avatar
cuchulainn
Instigator
Posts: 31004
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 5:57 pm

Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by cuchulainn » Sun Aug 12, 2012 3:44 am

Romney Ryan have the same contempt for the middle class as does the elite of Mexico.

User avatar
judik
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 20787
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:21 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by judik » Sun Aug 12, 2012 3:46 am

As you know, I caught on to it 25 years ago. What's taking you so long to adjust your voting habits to Gary Johnson for Pres?

Because he is unelectable
What is taking you so long to get that?
What about the Bubba years? Were the 90's so awful under a Pubic Congress?

Yes- times were good,Bush started his presidency with as surplus and squandered it
Do to the voting habits of your current hearth throb Ryan
You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried everything else.

Winston Churchill

Lost Soul
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 56456
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Lost Soul » Sun Aug 12, 2012 3:52 am

cuchulainn wrote:Romney Ryan have the same contempt for the middle class as does the elite of Mexico.

You are quite the clueless one, cuchforbrains.

Maobama has the contempt, which is why he just raised taxes on the entire middle class, to pay for his base of l00sers.

A question for your esteemed mind: If you punish achievement and reward failure, which one do you get more of?

Or just compare and contrast China in 1976 vs. China in 2006, or 1000 other examples. This isn't too difficult.
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

Lost Soul
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 56456
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Lost Soul » Sun Aug 12, 2012 3:55 am

judik wrote:
As you know, I caught on to it 25 years ago. What's taking you so long to adjust your voting habits to Gary Johnson for Pres?

Because he is unelectable
What is taking you so long to get that?

Unlike you, I don't tip the hangman; nor do I vote for politicians that suck. It's sad that you do.

What about the Bubba years? Were the 90's so awful under a Pubic Congress?

Yes- times were good,Bush started his presidency with as surplus and squandered it
Do to the voting habits of your current hearth throb Ryan

You need help. Have a gander at the Mao.
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

User avatar
judik
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 20787
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:21 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by judik » Sun Aug 12, 2012 4:08 am

Maobama has the contempt, which is why he just raised taxes on the entire middle class, to pay for his base of l00sers.

Not true,stop watching faux news and actually read something
Under Romney my husband and I will pay $1300/yr more in taxes
Under Obama I will pay $1500 less


But go on being misinformed
Romney/Ryan are counting on you!!!!

You need help. Have a gander at the Ma

So you are denying that Bush started his term with a surplus and then squandered it?
And that Ryan voted for the Iraq war,Medicare Part D,Tarp. and other parts of the bailout which you so abhor?

You got nothing

Unlike you, I don't tip the hangman; nor do I vote for politicians that suck. It's sad that you do.

Sad?
Sad is an emotion that seems oddly out of place in this context
Get some perspective
You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried everything else.

Winston Churchill

User avatar
Godjira
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 67045
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:52 pm

Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Godjira » Sun Aug 12, 2012 4:23 am

Judi, don't waste your time. Arguing with Lost Soul that Obama isn't a communist is like arguing with a college freshman that Bush isn't Hitler.
That's the kind of bold flavor they enjoy in Albuquerque!

User avatar
judik
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 20787
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:21 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by judik » Sun Aug 12, 2012 4:47 am

I know, Godjira. But I practice in an evidence based environment and it't hard to break the habit
You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried everything else.

Winston Churchill

Lost Soul
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 56456
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Lost Soul » Sun Aug 12, 2012 5:18 am

judik wrote:
Maobama has the contempt, which is why he just raised taxes on the entire middle class, to pay for his base of l00sers.

Not true,stop watching faux news and actually read something
Under Romney my husband and I will pay $1300/yr more in taxes
Under Obama I will pay $1500 less

You are part of the problem. You can continue lying to yourself, as Dumbocrats with two homes are wont to do, just don't lie to me.

Do you have a 401k, an IRA, or own stocks? Two-thirds of Americans do. And guess what happens January 1?

But go on being misinformed
Romney/Ryan are counting on you!!!!

Psycho babble.

So you are denying that Bush started his term with a surplus and then squandered it?
And that Ryan voted for the Iraq war,Medicare Part D,Tarp. and other parts of the bailout which you so abhor?

Not at all.

My main problem is why people like you abhor it if an R does it, yet cover for it if a D does it. Unlike you, I've never voted for any of that shit.

You got nothing

Avalon will be busy in the fall.
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

User avatar
cuchulainn
Instigator
Posts: 31004
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 5:57 pm

Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by cuchulainn » Sun Aug 12, 2012 6:03 am

Romney will raise taxes on the middle class while giving fellow plutocrats a nice tax cut. He will also gut programs which benefit the middle class. Of course, he will increase the bloated military budget...while cutting benefits to veterans.

Lost Soul
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 56456
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Lost Soul » Sun Aug 12, 2012 6:19 am

cuchulainn wrote:Romney will raise taxes on the middle class while giving fellow plutocrats a nice tax cut. He will also gut programs which benefit the middle class. Of course, he will increase the bloated military budget...while cutting benefits to veterans.

You believe your own bullshit because great-gramps lost a little weight in 1847?

Or because it was the law of the Irish when gramps got off the boat to vote Dumbo, because your competition in the illiterate jobs category, ex-slaves, happened to be Republican?

Here's some news, cuchforbrains: You don't have to vote like your great-great-great-great-grandfather, the starving, drunken, priest-reamed savage.

Times change. Even the slaves abandoned their Saviours in the Republican party for your racist party, the fucking idiots.
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

User avatar
2wilzgood
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 14696
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 11:51 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by 2wilzgood » Sun Aug 12, 2012 6:44 am

Lost Soul wrote:Times change.


Maybe, but politics don't. You live in your own little world, and I have never understood what you stand for.

I pray you to pause and consider. Against our traditions we are now entering upon an unjust and trivial war, a war against a helpless people, and for a base object--robbery. At first our citizens spoke out against this thing, by an impulse natural to their training. Today they have turned, and their voice is the other way. What caused the change? Merely a politician's trick--a high-sounding phrase, a blood-stirring phrase which turned their uncritical heads: Our Country, right or wrong! An empty phrase, a silly phrase. It was shouted by every newspaper, it was thundered from the pulpit, the Superintendent of Public Instruction placarded it in every schoolhouse in the land, the War Department inscribed it upon the flag. And every man who failed to shout it or who was silent, was proclaimed a traitor--none but those others were patriots. To be a patriot, one had to say, and keep on saying, "Our Country, right or wrong," and urge on the little war. Have you not perceived that that phrase is an insult to the nation?

For in a republic, who is "the Country"? Is it the Government which is for the moment in the saddle? Why, the Government is merely a servant--merely a temporary servant; it cannot be its prerogative to determine what is right and what is wrong, and decide who is a patriot and who isn't. Its function is to obey orders, not originate them. Who, then, is "the Country"? Is it the newspaper? is it the pulpit? is it the school superintendent? Why, these are mere parts of the country, not the whole of it; they have not command, they have only their little share in the command. They are but one in the thousand; it is in the thousand that command is lodged; they must determine what is right and what is wrong; they must decide who is a patriot and who isn't.

Who are the thousand--that is to say, who are "the Country"? In a monarchy, the king and his family are the country; in a republic it is the common voice of the people. Each of you, for himself, by himself and on his own responsibility, must speak. And it is a solemn and weighty responsibility, and not lightly to be flung aside at the bullying of pulpit, press, government, or the empty catch-phrases of politicians. Each must for himself alone decide what is right and what is wrong, and which course is patriotic and which isn't. You cannot shirk this and be a man. To decide it against your convictions is to be an unqualified and inexcusable traitor, both to yourself and to your country, let men label you as they may.


You can claim yourself a Libertarian all you want, but it doesn't mean that you say much. Pointing out folly isn't difficult, but you never quite pull it off.

Lost Soul wrote:You'll soon discover that fiscal sanity...


Fail.
I used to feel empathy for the poor. Now I just want them all to die. - ScottBaio
You will die like a dog for no good reason. - Hemingway
My efforts here are wasted - wilz

Lost Soul
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 56456
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Lost Soul » Sun Aug 12, 2012 8:07 am

2wilzgood wrote:
Lost Soul wrote:Times change.


Maybe, but politics don't. You live in your own little world, and I have never understood what you stand for.

I pray you to pause and consider. Against our traditions we are now entering upon an unjust and trivial war, a war against a helpless people, and for a base object--robbery. At first our citizens spoke out against this thing, by an impulse natural to their training. Today they have turned, and their voice is the other way. What caused the change? Merely a politician's trick--a high-sounding phrase, a blood-stirring phrase which turned their uncritical heads: Our Country, right or wrong! An empty phrase, a silly phrase. It was shouted by every newspaper, it was thundered from the pulpit, the Superintendent of Public Instruction placarded it in every schoolhouse in the land, the War Department inscribed it upon the flag. And every man who failed to shout it or who was silent, was proclaimed a traitor--none but those others were patriots. To be a patriot, one had to say, and keep on saying, "Our Country, right or wrong," and urge on the little war. Have you not perceived that that phrase is an insult to the nation?

For in a republic, who is "the Country"? Is it the Government which is for the moment in the saddle? Why, the Government is merely a servant--merely a temporary servant; it cannot be its prerogative to determine what is right and what is wrong, and decide who is a patriot and who isn't. Its function is to obey orders, not originate them. Who, then, is "the Country"? Is it the newspaper? is it the pulpit? is it the school superintendent? Why, these are mere parts of the country, not the whole of it; they have not command, they have only their little share in the command. They are but one in the thousand; it is in the thousand that command is lodged; they must determine what is right and what is wrong; they must decide who is a patriot and who isn't.

Who are the thousand--that is to say, who are "the Country"? In a monarchy, the king and his family are the country; in a republic it is the common voice of the people. Each of you, for himself, by himself and on his own responsibility, must speak. And it is a solemn and weighty responsibility, and not lightly to be flung aside at the bullying of pulpit, press, government, or the empty catch-phrases of politicians. Each must for himself alone decide what is right and what is wrong, and which course is patriotic and which isn't. You cannot shirk this and be a man. To decide it against your convictions is to be an unqualified and inexcusable traitor, both to yourself and to your country, let men label you as they may.

Mark Twain?

You can claim yourself a Libertarian all you want, but it doesn't mean that you say much. Pointing out folly isn't difficult, but you never quite pull it off.

Fail.

Props from the failed, socialist, shithole lying just south of the US. Wake me when I can drink the water.
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

User avatar
cuchulainn
Instigator
Posts: 31004
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 5:57 pm

Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by cuchulainn » Sun Aug 12, 2012 9:08 am

Of course, Lost Soul lived in a cabin in the tundra. He hasn't worn shorts in months and hasn't seen a non-Eskimo woman in years. He thinks Ayn Rand is a great writer and pines for seal blubber.

He doesn't know what's going on.

Lost Soul
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 56456
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Lost Soul » Sun Aug 12, 2012 9:55 am

cuchulainn wrote:Of course, Lost Soul lived in a cabin in the tundra. He hasn't worn shorts in months and hasn't seen a non-Eskimo woman in years. He thinks Ayn Rand is a great writer and pines for seal blubber.

As your life coach, I think you really need to get laid.

But first, please brush your teeth.
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

User avatar
Citizen Baba
Mayor McCheese
Posts: 23746
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 5:44 am

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Citizen Baba » Sun Aug 12, 2012 6:13 pm

Why do people bother arguing with a nihilist?

User avatar
incognita
red fanged She-devil
Posts: 20458
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:11 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by incognita » Sun Aug 12, 2012 7:49 pm

Oh dear, backpedaling already:

"Gov. Romney is at the top of the ticket,” noted Romney spokesman Kevin Madden. Another adviser said that while Romney would have signed Ryan’s budget, if he wins the election he would “be putting forward his own budget.”


http://news.yahoo.com/gop-looks-disting ... 46057.html
As an adult, the beer aisle at the grocery makes me feel exactly like the cereal aisle made me feel as a kid.

8645

User avatar
Citizen Baba
Mayor McCheese
Posts: 23746
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 5:44 am

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Citizen Baba » Sun Aug 12, 2012 8:48 pm

Cisco wrote:
Citizen Baba wrote:A couple months ago Lost Soul and cisco were telling us business experience should be a requirement for becoming president.

What's changed?


I made two posts on that topic.

The first was:

"I don't think Romney seriously pitched the idea. During a campaign speech, he related a conversation he had with a restaurant owner who said he would like to have such an amendment passed. It was a nice anecdote to illustrate the desirability of some business experience in a presidential candidate."

And here's the second:

"Seriously, my post was not intended to argue for or against the idea, although I think some business or management experience would certainly be very helpful. I simply intended to show that it was not Romney's idea to seek such a constitutional amendment."

Which of those posts indicate that I believe that business experience should be a requirement for becoming president?


Okay, fair enough, cisco. I apologize.

Cisco
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 2062
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:23 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by Cisco » Sun Aug 12, 2012 10:39 pm

Citizen Baba wrote:Okay, fair enough, cisco. I apologize.


Thank you.

Respect.

User avatar
korgy
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24956
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 12:55 am

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by korgy » Mon Aug 13, 2012 2:57 am

Lost Soul wrote:In my defense, I said Palin was great compared to idiot Biden (especially), McBane or Maobama. I also said she was too leftist for me to vote for.


i just come on now occasionally for a laugh, and it didn't take too long this time...

nice work, LS
"Iranians apparently disagree with korgy"

tph24601
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 6640
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:32 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by tph24601 » Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:50 am

funny how the righties keep claiming the democrats are the fiscal irresponsible socialists, ignoring the fact that the national debt per capita actually grew under the 2 Bushes and Reagan, while it actually decreased under Clinton and Carter. Yes, Carter reduced debt more than saint Ronny, I can understand why that wasn't mentioned in any of the Fox News shows.....

Oh, and the stock market increased dramatically during the terms of the two secret socialists presidents, Slick Willy and Maobama, while tanking under the two Bushes. So clearly all those wall street traders are secret socialists who hate capitalism and america too....

User avatar
eric84
Moderator
Posts: 55162
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 8:31 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by eric84 » Mon Aug 13, 2012 2:56 pm

I can see why LS is such a Ryan fan given that they both are fake libertarians. Ryan supported Shrub's spending and has sucked on the government teat all his adult life. Government restraint is always from someone else.
Love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair.

tph24601
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 6640
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:32 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by tph24601 » Mon Aug 13, 2012 3:20 pm

all of the sudden it's Ok being a washington insider and a lifelong politician......

rider5
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 18599
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 4:45 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by rider5 » Mon Aug 13, 2012 4:24 pm

Go Waldo/Alfalfa 2012!

User avatar
joeyramone
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 18460
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:43 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by joeyramone » Mon Aug 13, 2012 4:38 pm

The two of them standin g together looked like a a meeting of a country club board of directors.
"Your fairy tale would sound better if two elves came out and did the Safety Dance at the end." Logg to Zaffer

tph24601
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 6640
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:32 pm

Re: Paul Ryan vs Maobama: the Smackdown!

Post by tph24601 » Mon Aug 13, 2012 8:43 pm

I guess Romney gave up on the Latino voters by now......

Post Reply