Page 22 of 22

Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:35 am
by Kerikiwi
Actually the 'western' dressed woman(henceforth #1) was attacking the traditionally dressed woman(#2) because #1 owns a fruit stand and #2 was stealing fruit, so #1 beat #2 up. #2 was wearing traditional dress to hinder identification, which pissed #1 off even more.

Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:35 pm
by Kerikiwi
Fact: Iran has fruit stalls.
Fact: Iran has thieves.

Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 4:48 am
by Kerikiwi
If I say that you might be right about the reason for the attack, could you agree that you might not be right?
I have as much evidence for my explanation as you have for yours, that is not much at all.

Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 8:04 pm
by Kerikiwi
Do you claim that in Iran there are neither fruit stalls nor thieves?

And are you saying that there is no other possible reason for the assault than that which you claim?

The fruit was used as missiles during the parts of the fight we didn't see.

Re: A Real Woman Fights Back at the Religious Police in Iran

Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2016 5:03 am
by Ignominy
Touch my Monkey.

Re: A Real Woman Fights Back at the Religious Police in Iran

Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2016 5:12 am
by mad hatter
Ignominy wrote:Touch my Monkey.

Only if you call me Penelope.