Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Resurrection of all-time best threads

Moderator: Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
chimes
resident rebel
Posts: 11854
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:57 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by chimes » Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:50 pm

Image


Image


Image


Lithium (ion) batteries in order to locate lost lithium (ion) batteries...
If it wasn't so sad, it would almost sound as a joke.

spampants
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 7495
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 12:45 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by spampants » Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:58 pm

It'll be years, maybe decades before they find that plane.
"Love is our greatest teacher." -moethebartender

"Spampants are right and I was wrong." -VinnyD

"a seriot pin sfdi poiw cIw;eE gjJirol" -polardude

"Fuck you." -pezworld

Geece
Scratty Peasant
Posts: 8823
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:16 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by Geece » Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:02 pm

spampants wrote:It'll be years, maybe decades before they find that plane.


BREAKING: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370: New debris confirmed as seat from missing plane


http://edition.cnn.com/2014/04/14/world ... nes-plane/

spampants
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 7495
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 12:45 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by spampants » Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:14 pm

Geece wrote:
spampants wrote:It'll be years, maybe decades before they find that plane.


BREAKING: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370: New debris confirmed as seat from missing plane


http://edition.cnn.com/2014/04/14/world ... nes-plane/


It's been floating on the open ocean for nearly six weeks.
"Love is our greatest teacher." -moethebartender

"Spampants are right and I was wrong." -VinnyD

"a seriot pin sfdi poiw cIw;eE gjJirol" -polardude

"Fuck you." -pezworld

User avatar
WhosieWho
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 6156
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 7:01 pm

Red Herring Salad for you, hon.

Post by WhosieWho » Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:10 pm

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/malaysia-ai ... -herrings/

And how many hundred million $s more need be spent for the grieving families to get "closure"? The bodies have long gone crab-salad, by now.

Better to spend money on starving babies in Africa, obv.
"This entire paragraph is just repeating Fake News. There was NO blood, NO semen and there was NO Satanism. Delete." -- The Editor

User avatar
Kilombo
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 13653
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by Kilombo » Tue Apr 15, 2014 1:40 am

According to CNN the co pilot had his cell phone on during that flight, something very unusual.
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/04/14/world ... ?hpt=hp_t1
Prost!

FUUZ
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 7784
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 7:41 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by FUUZ » Wed Apr 16, 2014 12:10 am

Crazy suicidal pilot driven mad by-what?, too many viewings of Kim Kardashian's sex tape?- plans clever suicide trip with destination deep water area far from land, hoping the plane will never be found and his evil actions never known, because he wants to spare his family (and perhaps cult) shame.
As I wander and chunder, I ponder and wonder.
I'm Slumming in Bedlam. Amuse me.

User avatar
Godjira
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 61384
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:52 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by Godjira » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:43 am

Kilombo wrote:According to CNN the co pilot had his cell phone on during that flight, something very unusual.
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/04/14/world ... ?hpt=hp_t1


I've heard that plane crews always use their cell phones in flight
That's the kind of bold flavor they enjoy in Albuquerque!

User avatar
Bill Barilko
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 14259
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:34 am

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by Bill Barilko » Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:52 am

Godjira wrote:I've heard that plane crews always use their cell phones in flight

WTF else do they have to do?
Nexus the criminally insane whore/backstabber wrote:You missed the porn site I set up in your name....Shall I send the link to everyone?

User avatar
ZAffer
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24336
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 8:47 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by ZAffer » Fri Apr 18, 2014 2:51 pm

Given their track record to date, hardly confidence inspiring.

Azharuddin added that Malaysia would lead most of the investigation, with Australia and others helping.
sce to aux

User avatar
andybox
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24659
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:09 am

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by andybox » Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:49 am

Malaysia may not have a choice if the aircraft is found in Australian waters. If there's issues, the ICAO will determine who does the crash investigation. In saying that, why any country would deny outside help to investigate an event such as this is beyond logic.

Lost Soul
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 47829
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by Lost Soul » Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:56 am

chimes wrote:
Lost Soul wrote:
ZAffer wrote:Hazardous cargo, specifically li-ion batteries.
ACARS to report position.

The muzzy pilot opened a hatch in the passenger section and climbed down during the flight in order to disconnect the ACARS radio.

Yeah, the FAA is to blame. :roll:

You need help, Saffer.


Bull. You've entirely missed the information re. a fire on board (cargo room or anywhere else on the aircraft), and subsequent loss of all communication tools.

Fact!

Oy vey.

And the plane flies merrily onward for six hours with a raging fire on board? Uh huh.

Chimes and Saffer sitting in a tree.......
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

User avatar
ZAffer
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24336
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 8:47 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by ZAffer » Sat Apr 19, 2014 5:19 am

"And the plane flies merrily onward for six hours with a raging fire on board? Uh huh."

I never said that, you dull, illiterate, cognitively-impaired dumb fuck.
sce to aux

User avatar
Godjira
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 61384
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:52 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by Godjira » Sat Apr 19, 2014 9:43 am

There is even a possibility that the 6 hour thing is wrong. Everything about this disaster that has been reported turns out to be wrong.
That's the kind of bold flavor they enjoy in Albuquerque!

User avatar
chimes
resident rebel
Posts: 11854
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:57 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by chimes » Sun Apr 20, 2014 10:43 am

Lost Soul wrote:Oy vey.

And the plane flies merrily onward for six hours with a raging fire on board? Uh huh.

You overlook the theory that the aircraft was deliberately taken up to ridiculous heights, around when it made the turn back to Malaysia: namely in order to try and extuingish the fire.

Don't ask me for the technical specs of such a manoeuvre, but it seems that were at least two precedents in this respect. One in Australia, if I remember correctly. It was all published in the first few days after the plane had disappeared. Maybe Andybox or ZAffer still recall.

In that case, the fact that the aircraft was made to climb só extremely high that it even brought the integrity of its "body" in jeopardy, it may have worked and it may have put an end to the fire. With too hazardous fumes on board meanwhile, however, to enable the pilots to make it land again indeed.

Lost Soul
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 47829
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by Lost Soul » Sun Apr 20, 2014 10:46 am

You overlook the theory that the aircraft was deliberately taken up to ridiculous heights

Read the thread.

FIRE!
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

User avatar
andybox
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24659
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:09 am

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by andybox » Sun Apr 20, 2014 10:54 am

Chimes, the aircraft was deliberately turned around. There was no communication, no mayday, no fire, no emergency declared. No pilot would climb to altitude to extinguish a fire when there are fire suppressant stems inbuilt. They have drills, they have procedures. They have oxygen masks. That aircraft was deliberately fucked with to render both the non flying crew member, cabin crew and passengers incapacitated.

User avatar
chimes
resident rebel
Posts: 11854
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:57 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by chimes » Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:07 am

andybox wrote:Chimes, the aircraft was deliberately turned around. There was no communication, no mayday, no fire, no emergency declared. No pilot would climb to altitude to extinguish a fire when there are fire suppressant stems inbuilt. They have drills, they have procedures. They have oxygen masks. That aircraft was deliberately fucked with to render both the non flying crew member, cabin crew and passengers incapacitated.


There are at least two or more examples (Australia, and elsewhere) of a situation where a fire broke out and virtually immediately, the plane lost all its communication tools & its radar position "pings" and stuff. I.e. became invisible.

Thát crew nevertheless managed to land the aircraft, and they survived. Which is why "we" (meaning the aviation world in the first place), know it. I heard experts talking about in the news, and it must have been in various publications as well lately. That a fire on board has the potential to cut off any communications. I mean: fast.

User avatar
andybox
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24659
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:09 am

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by andybox » Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:11 am

I've never heard of a modern jet experiencing that Chimes, but i'm open to learning new things. A light aircraft definitely, but a modern passenger jet? Explosion mid air due to fire, yeah. Fire alone?

Lost Soul
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 47829
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by Lost Soul » Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:14 am

There are at least two or more examples (Australia, and elsewhere) of a situation where a fire broke out and virtually immediately, the plane lost all its communication tools & its radar position "pings" and stuff. I.e. became invisible.

Thát crew nevertheless managed to land the aircraft, and they survived. Which is why "we" (meaning the aviation world in the first place), know it. I heard experts talking about in the news, and it must have been in various publications as well lately.

Yes, with fire on board you go down, not up. Thanks for confirming that for Saffer.

FIRE!
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

User avatar
ZAffer
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24336
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 8:47 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by ZAffer » Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:16 am

sce to aux

User avatar
andybox
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24659
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:09 am

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by andybox » Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:20 am

They climbed to altitude to extinguish a fire, with total loss of communication and radar locale?

Lost Soul
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 47829
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by Lost Soul » Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:20 am

FIRE!
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

User avatar
ZAffer
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24336
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 8:47 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by ZAffer » Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:23 am

andybox wrote:They climbed to altitude to extinguish a fire, with total loss of communication and radar locale?


Re-read the thread, you lazy cunt. It's all here, and I'm fucked if I'm going to repeat myself (again) to some cognitively impaired cunt.
sce to aux

User avatar
andybox
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24659
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:09 am

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by andybox » Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:25 am

Zaffer those pilots had communication with Bahrain ATC and were offered a diversion to Doha. What's your link with MH? Lazy cunt? Are you drunk again?

Lost Soul
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 47829
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by Lost Soul » Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:28 am

BOMB!
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

User avatar
northern_goddess
Queen Bee
Posts: 49502
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 8:48 am

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by northern_goddess » Sun Apr 20, 2014 8:07 pm

I'm sensing Seat Sales in the near future for Malaysia Airlines.

Malaysia Airlines flight MH192 makes emergency landing

Flight with 166 people on board lands safely after returning to Kuala Lumpur

A Malaysia Airlines passenger plane with 166 people on board landed safely at Kuala Lumpur airport early on Monday after being forced to abandon a flight to Bangalore because of problems with its landing gear, the airline said.

Defence Minister and Acting Transport Minister Hishammuddin Hussein said in a tweet: "All landed safely - going there now!!"

Malaysia Airlines had said earlier that the Boeing 737-800, carrying 159 passengers and seven crew, had suffered a malfunction of its right-hand landing gear upon takeoff, and would be forced to attempt an emergency landing.

The website Flightradar24, which displays live air traffic, showed Flight MH192 repeatedly circling Kuala Lumpur airport before the eventual landing.

Fire rescue services had been placed on standby, according to the airline.

Last month a Malaysia Airlines flight disappeared on a flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing in unexplained circumstances with 239 people on board, and the search for its presumed wreckage is still continuing in the Indian Ocean.


http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/malaysia-airlines-flight-mh192-makes-emergency-landing-1.2616152
I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it.

http://www.fat-pie.com/salad.htm

fishface
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 7048
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 1:18 am

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by fishface » Sun Apr 20, 2014 10:17 pm

I would still happily fly them, especially if there are sales.

FUUZ
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 7784
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 7:41 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by FUUZ » Wed Apr 23, 2014 1:22 am

Coyote, Fenris, Eris, and Loki, are watching and snickering....
As I wander and chunder, I ponder and wonder.
I'm Slumming in Bedlam. Amuse me.

User avatar
brodie_bruce
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 8947
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 6:21 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by brodie_bruce » Wed Apr 23, 2014 7:28 am

I would too. Especially as there's a chance I end up in Malaysia for a flying visit (no pun intended) on the way home later this year......

There was something on news.com.au that they're looking in to the theory that it landed again. Hmmmmm.
Hard work pays off in the future; laziness pays off now.

User avatar
ZAffer
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24336
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 8:47 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by ZAffer » Wed Apr 23, 2014 7:47 am

brodie_bruce wrote:
There was something on news.com.au that they're looking in to the theory that it landed again. Hmmmmm.


Saw that. One of my slower friends posted that on FB, and I just thought: "THAT one AGAIN??". Guess that's one conspiracy theory with legs.
sce to aux

User avatar
andybox
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24659
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:09 am

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by andybox » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:26 am

Possible wreckage washed up at Augusta on the far sth west coast of WA? Saw the tail end of a report about an hour ago.

User avatar
brodie_bruce
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 8947
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 6:21 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by brodie_bruce » Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:04 am

Hard work pays off in the future; laziness pays off now.

User avatar
ZAffer
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24336
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 8:47 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by ZAffer » Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:13 am

Given the number of false debris sitings to date, I'm not optimistic.

Also, any debris that floats has been pummeled by the ocean for 6 (?) Weeks. Can't be much left.
sce to aux

User avatar
chimes
resident rebel
Posts: 11854
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:57 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by chimes » Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:35 am

andybox wrote:Possible wreckage washed up at Augusta on the far sth west coast of WA? Saw the tail end of a report about an hour ago.

Heard it on Dutch radio just now.

In a way, it is to be hoped it is true. For it would help to bring closure for grieving relatives, friends.

Nothing worse imo than never knowing for sure.

User avatar
ZAffer
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24336
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 8:47 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by ZAffer » Thu Apr 24, 2014 2:41 am

"Augusta, Australia (CNN) - A metal object that washed ashore on Australia's coast wasn't from Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, officials said."

Wouldn't surprise me if they're looking in the wrong place too!
sce to aux

Lost Soul
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 47829
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by Lost Soul » Thu Apr 24, 2014 2:49 am

Maybe that version of the evil, FAA approved, 777 was made of Magnesium and it burned up underwater due to the fire on board?

Yes! Consider the case cracked!
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

User avatar
andybox
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24659
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:09 am

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by andybox » Thu Apr 24, 2014 2:54 am

ZAffer wrote:"Augusta, Australia (CNN) - A metal object that washed ashore on Australia's coast wasn't from Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, officials said."

Wouldn't surprise me if they're looking in the wrong place too!

Why wouldnt it surprise you Zaffer?

User avatar
ZAffer
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24336
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 8:47 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by ZAffer » Thu Apr 24, 2014 3:03 am

It's been somewhat of a fuckup from the beginning, but the detected black box 'pings' were slightly off-frequency. And who else has actually checked that raw data? Being off-frequency, maybe someone got the triangulation calculations wrong. Or, worst case, it's not from the bb pinger at all!
sce to aux

User avatar
andybox
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24659
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:09 am

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by andybox » Thu Apr 24, 2014 3:49 am

There was a report that search vessels.were picking up their own pings, but id assume they would be able to tell the difference. They know more than they are letting out. The Chinese suddenly shifted their search grid much further north, and Australia followed soon after. Its there, on the ocean floor, but finding it is gonna be difficult. You dont narrow down search areas without hard evidence.

User avatar
ZAffer
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24336
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 8:47 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by ZAffer » Thu Apr 24, 2014 4:11 am

Maybe someone checked all the images from satelites and got one of the plane in flight. Or crashing.
sce to aux

User avatar
ZAffer
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24336
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 8:47 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by ZAffer » Tue Apr 29, 2014 10:12 am

Oh oh. That would be more than awkward.

as the missing MH370 been found in the Bay of Bengal? Probably, says an Australian marine exploration company.

GeoResonance says it has found the wreckage of the crashed Malaysian plane in the Bay of Bengal, 5,000 km away from the current search location in the Indian Ocean.
sce to aux

User avatar
chimes
resident rebel
Posts: 11854
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:57 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by chimes » Tue Apr 29, 2014 10:24 am

ZAffer wrote:Has the missing MH370 been found in the Bay of Bengal? Probably, says an Australian marine exploration company.

Shit...., you're right.


GeoResonance’s search covered 2,000,000 square kilometres of the possible crash zone, using images obtained from satellites and aircraft, with company scientists focusing their efforts north of plane’s last known location, using over 20 technologies to analyse the data including a nuclear reactor, company spokesperson David Pope said.

He claimed his company used technology originally designed to find nuclear warheads and submarines.

Mr. Pope said GeoResonance compared their findings with images taken on March 5, three days before MH370 went missing, and did not find what they had detected at the spot.

“The wreckage wasn’t there prior to the disappearance of MH370. We’re not trying to say it definitely is MH370. However, it is a lead we feel should be followed up,” said Mr. Pope.


Malaysia’s Department of Civil Aviation Director-General Azharuddin Abdul Rahman told the paper that Malaysia was unaware of the report of the finding.

“We will have to check and verify this report,” he said.

Another GeoResonance spokesperson, Pavel Kursa, said several elements found in commercial airliners were detected at the Bay of Bengal spot identified by GeoResonance.

“We identified chemical elements and materials that make up a Boeing 777...these are aluminium, titanium, copper, steel alloys and other materials,” said Mr. Kursa in a statement.

The Beijing-bound Malaysia Airlines flight MH370- carrying 239 people, including five Indians, an Indo-Canadian and 154 Chinese nationals - had mysteriously vanished on March 8 after taking off from Kuala Lumpur.

The mystery of the missing plane continued to baffle aviation and security authorities who have so far not succeeded in tracking the aircraft despite deploying hi-tech radar and other gadgets.


The Hindu : Australian exploration company believes it may have found Malaysian plane
http://www.thehindu.com/news/internatio ... 958812.ece
.

At first I thought it would be unrealistic that debris would still be floating around on the surface of the sea.
But that's not how GeoResonance approached the problem... they "simply" compared satellite pics...

:idea:

User avatar
chimes
resident rebel
Posts: 11854
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:57 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by chimes » Tue Apr 29, 2014 10:34 am

.
Wów! GeoResonance' website : http://georesonance.com/

Precise exploration down to 5,000 metres

We are an Australian company that offers a unique and proven method of geophysical survey.
Subsurface exploration has never been so precise - we detect the nuclei of targeted substances.
GeoResonance Remote Sensing and On-Site Survey will delineate your deposit in weeks not years.
Any commodity. Any tenement. Anywhere.


How come "we" didn't hear of them before? They seem like exactly the type of experienced searchers, needed in this whole project right from the start.

User avatar
chimes
resident rebel
Posts: 11854
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:57 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by chimes » Tue Apr 29, 2014 10:37 am

.
Even Messrs. Google had never heard of them.

When you try to find the news or the website, Google keeps asking : Did you mean: BioResonance

Pff!

User avatar
chimes
resident rebel
Posts: 11854
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:57 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by chimes » Tue Apr 29, 2014 9:22 pm

.

^uyg

User avatar
andybox
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24659
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:09 am

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by andybox » Tue Apr 29, 2014 9:38 pm

An American pilot claims to have spotted the aircraft in the Gulf of Thailand using satellite imagery. Those 3 areas are miles apart.

User avatar
k2w3
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 6473
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 9:39 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by k2w3 » Wed Apr 30, 2014 12:06 am

So... No closer to finding this thing, and the limp Ockers have reduced their searching.
NA: "You just have to search out the weirdos who are weird in a way that seems perfectly normal to you."

User avatar
Kilombo
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 13653
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by Kilombo » Wed Apr 30, 2014 12:16 am

that plane went into a timetrap. They landed in the 18th century
Prost!

User avatar
ZAffer
Stew Ingredient
Posts: 24336
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 8:47 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines 777-200

Post by ZAffer » Wed Apr 30, 2014 3:43 am

Kilombo wrote:that plane went into a timetrap. They landed in the 18th century


Naah, can't be. If it landed in Australia, even they would have stumbled across it by now.
sce to aux

Post Reply