Stew banning transparency

Provide your questions, comments, ideas and suggested improvements to Political Stew here.

Moderator: Moderator

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 17603
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby muthafunky » Thu Feb 16, 2017 6:55 pm

Typically the more mods provide info or explanations the more people complain and argue with the mods. So no, I don't see any upside to this. If you really care you can probably ask around and find out if someone was banned or left, the stew collective can typically give you the right answer.

Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 39867
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 8:31 pm
Location: Winnipeg

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby eric84 » Thu Feb 16, 2017 8:02 pm

I'll just speculate wildly then that Mutha has Patrick locked in the trunk of car then and see where it takes us.
Love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair.

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 12403
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 1:56 pm

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby shunter » Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:42 pm

guruwil wrote:I thought I was clear, but to ensure there is no doubt
1. I don't regard this as a right and Mutha and crew can and will do whatever they want with it. It was merely a request.
2. I am not interested in starting an argument or feud about the bannings. Just would
Like to know if any of those who have disappeared might come back one day or if they are gone for good.

It was not a demand it was a polite request.


I demand you are banned for being beige and owning an excessive number of apple products.

And I want written confirmation.
Untrollable since 2017

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 3612
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 1:42 pm

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby DCComic » Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:13 pm

muthafunky wrote:Typically the more mods provide info or explanations the more people complain and argue with the mods. So no, I don't see any upside to this. If you really care you can probably ask around and find out if someone was banned or left, the stew collective can typically give you the right answer.


Nah.
Pez decides. She knows who the good people are and that's that.
If I could coax you into suicide, I would.

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 17268
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 7:08 pm

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby mad hatter » Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:47 am

felching central^
Anyone can go by horse or rail, but the absolute best way to travel is by hat.

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 6097
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 2:03 pm
Location: Some old duck pond

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby The Mallard Missie » Fri Feb 17, 2017 7:10 am

eric84 wrote:I'll just speculate wildly then that Mutha has Patrick locked in the trunk of car then and see where it takes us.


Weren't you sacked for being the worst moderator in the history of this forum? Oh, and for also being a Nazi? Onlly askin'.

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 2297
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2015 12:07 am
Location: The Outer Limits

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby StanDeManII » Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:27 am

This might help............





Godjira:
Imagine? This cheap ass prick tries to stuff one of his overside dumps down the toilet,then the toilet floods,causing a rain of Stan-Stool beer vomit and water over the elderly couple downstairs.. and then charge for his substandard work.

Stew Ingredient
Posts: 36975
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am
Location: Alaska

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby Lost Soul » Sat Feb 18, 2017 1:07 am

I think the mods are doing a great job.

Short Man Complex has informed me that they banned him, and without any prompting from me.

Keep up the good work, everybody.
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 6097
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 2:03 pm
Location: Some old duck pond

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby The Mallard Missie » Sat Feb 18, 2017 12:22 pm

Lost Soul wrote:I think the mods are doing a great job.

Short Man Complex has informed me that they banned him, and without any prompting from me.

Keep up the good work, everybody.


They have always done a magnificent job under the most arduous of circumstances, especially missie Pez.

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 48379
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 7:11 pm

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby Stephen_Dedalus » Sat Feb 18, 2017 3:18 pm

What a bunch of cock wombles.

Is this 10th grade?

The funny thing is, most/all of you are on the wrong side of 40/50!

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha......

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 8:20 am
Location: In the tower.

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby Annotated » Sat Feb 18, 2017 8:06 pm

mad hatter wrote:why did felix/ignomy get banned? i heard it was for identifying someones RL details which is the ultimate no no, if that's the case why is he still running around as meat and the other handles that are known by all to be felix?


It's not exactly the "rule of law" around here.

In fact, it's anything but.
Fuck the Founding Fathers. There's a new daddy in town!

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 7685
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby Moethebartender » Sun Feb 19, 2017 12:35 am

Candy wrote:
muthafunky wrote:Typically the more mods provide info or explanations the more people complain and argue with the mods. So no, I don't see any upside to this. If you really care you can probably ask around and find out if someone was banned or left, the stew collective can typically give you the right answer.


Nah.
Pez decides. She knows who the good people are and that's that.


If she's the person who decided to let your psycho ass back here after your 478th lifetime ban on sight, then her judgement is warped beyond repair. You attacked some anonymous person from the internet in real life because he caused you to get angry. Unfortunately, that isn't difficult to do. You're not good people, you're a cunt who deserved to be stomped into the ground for what you did.




How many times are you fucking idiots going to allow this crazy fucking cunt back here?
A Straylian wit on the presidential election wrote: You've gone from chimp to orangutan in your evolutionary political process. I hope to live long enough to witness the rise of homo sensibilus in Amerikkka.

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 6097
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 2:03 pm
Location: Some old duck pond

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby The Mallard Missie » Sun Feb 19, 2017 7:33 am

What did the low class cunt do? I am not "au fait" with past happenings.

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 16313
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:41 pm

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby grecian » Mon Feb 20, 2017 8:58 pm

Don't you worry your tail, Missie...

All's Cool...



Stew Ingredient
Posts: 36975
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am
Location: Alaska

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby Lost Soul » Mon Feb 20, 2017 11:46 pm

The Mallard Missie wrote:What did the low class cunt do? I am not "au fait" with past happenings.

He burrowed into Felix's life after Felix pissed him off about his dead father.

http://politicalstew.com/bb/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=112916
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 6097
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 2:03 pm
Location: Some old duck pond

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby The Mallard Missie » Tue Feb 21, 2017 8:47 am

What a cunt - yet he is allowed to post again, whereas Bashtard is banned on sight. Something queer going on there I must say.

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 17268
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 7:08 pm

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby mad hatter » Tue Feb 21, 2017 8:51 am

Lost Soul wrote:
The Mallard Missie wrote:What did the low class cunt do? I am not "au fait" with past happenings.

He burrowed into Felix's life after Felix pissed him off about his dead father.

http://politicalstew.com/bb/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=112916

well if felix was burrowing into his dead father.
Anyone can go by horse or rail, but the absolute best way to travel is by hat.

Stew Ingredient
Posts: 36975
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am
Location: Alaska

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby Lost Soul » Wed Feb 22, 2017 1:56 pm

Yeah, I think the mods may be allowing for mitigating factors in their rulings.
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 7685
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby Moethebartender » Wed Feb 22, 2017 2:54 pm

Lost Soul wrote:
The Mallard Missie wrote:What did the low class cunt do? I am not "au fait" with past happenings.

He burrowed into Felix's life after Felix pissed him off about his dead father.

http://politicalstew.com/bb/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=112916


He was allowed back after that 'permanent ban' and did something that got him another 'permanent ban'/"ban on sight" again. I've no idea what he did that last time, but it's clear that allowing him back was a mistake. I've no idea why they've let him back yet again. Maybe this time, he won't go batshit crazy like he's done the other 432 times he's gotten himself binned from here.

Yeah, I think the mods may be allowing for mitigating factors in their rulings.


I think the mods broke their magic 8 ball and haven't figured out how to fix it.
A Straylian wit on the presidential election wrote: You've gone from chimp to orangutan in your evolutionary political process. I hope to live long enough to witness the rise of homo sensibilus in Amerikkka.

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 18257
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 12:12 am

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby Flobster! » Wed Feb 22, 2017 3:24 pm

Given that the premise of this thread is that we don't know if someone has what you call a 'permanent ban' and Mutha has confirmed that no such information is given, how do you know, Moe?
The pies and sausage rolls are good in Australia - Iolar

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 7685
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby Moethebartender » Wed Feb 22, 2017 8:12 pm

Flopster; wrote:Given that the premise of this thread is that we don't know if someone has what you call a 'permanent ban' and Mutha has confirmed that no such information is given, how do you know, Moe?


That isn't what he said at all. I realize that you can barely communicate in English, but this is what he actually said:

Fluffermunky wrote:Typically the more mods provide info or explanations the more people complain and argue with the mods. So no, I don't see any upside to this. If you really care you can probably ask around and find out if someone was banned or left, the stew collective can typically give you the right answer.


Aside from being here during many of Candy's bannings that result from his peculiar form of insanity, there's little nuggets like this that provide subtle hints about these things:

Modforlife Incognita wrote:Candy was banned a long time ago and remains at ban on sight.


Link

The "stew collective" just gave you the right answer. You're welcome, you drooling inbred moron.
A Straylian wit on the presidential election wrote: You've gone from chimp to orangutan in your evolutionary political process. I hope to live long enough to witness the rise of homo sensibilus in Amerikkka.

Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 39867
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 8:31 pm
Location: Winnipeg

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby eric84 » Wed Feb 22, 2017 8:58 pm

Moethebartender wrote:
Flopster; wrote:Given that the premise of this thread is that we don't know if someone has what you call a 'permanent ban' and Mutha has confirmed that no such information is given, how do you know, Moe?


That isn't what he said at all. I realize that you can barely communicate in English, but this is what he actually said:

Fluffermunky wrote:Typically the more mods provide info or explanations the more people complain and argue with the mods. So no, I don't see any upside to this. If you really care you can probably ask around and find out if someone was banned or left, the stew collective can typically give you the right answer.


Aside from being here during many of Candy's bannings that result from his peculiar form of insanity, there's little nuggets like this that provide subtle hints about these things:

Modforlife Incognita wrote:Candy was banned a long time ago and remains at ban on sight.


Link

The "stew collective" just gave you the right answer. You're welcome, you drooling inbred moron.


Hopefully, mutha chastised incognita for actually responding to someone's question about their ban status.
Love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair.

Stew Ingredient
Posts: 36975
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:02 am
Location: Alaska

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby Lost Soul » Wed Feb 22, 2017 11:52 pm

Poor Ereich.
IMPRISON BUSH!

INDICT HILLARY!

"Lost Soul is largely correct"- VinnyD

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 6097
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 2:03 pm
Location: Some old duck pond

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby The Mallard Missie » Thu Feb 23, 2017 7:20 am

Lost Soul wrote:Poor Ereich.


Is she the (alleged) Nazi who was sacked for being the worst moderator in the history of this forum?

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 16313
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:41 pm

Re: Stew banning transparency

Postby grecian » Thu Feb 23, 2017 10:56 pm



Previous

Return to Sound Off!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest