Soda's Wager With Ian

Resurrection of all-time best threads

Moderator: Moderator

Should Ian Accept Soda's Bet

Yes
29
73%
No
11
28%
 
Total votes : 40
Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 4:22 pm
Location: inside your head

Postby macunaima » Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:30 pm

Cogito wrote:Oh my god... it's happening again...



MOMMMMMMYYYYY MAKE IT STOP!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111
"Revolution is war. Of all the wars known in history
it is the only lawful, rightful, just, and truly great war...
In the Stew this war has been declared and begun"

STOP E-REICH!

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 131
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:18 pm
Location: UK

Postby Cogito » Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:34 pm

For a while, mac, I thought "Yay! Popcorn!" Now I just think earplugs, blinkers, and I wonder if LPTT is running.
ergo... um...

Evil Overlord
User avatar
Posts: 7853
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:25 am
Location: Soooooo Inside Your Head (TM)

Postby Ian_in_DC » Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:35 pm

Soda 2.0 wrote:Yes.

Results 1 - 10 of about 81,500 English and Finnish pages for extreme latent psychosis. (0.33 seconds)

And no, not many of them are in Finnish.

Nope, sorry - "extreme" used on the same webpage where "latent psychosis" does not count as validating it Soda. Please provide proof positive where latent psychosis has been described as "extreme." I thought not. Take your licks, Gimp, and move on.

I think your mock Moldovan credentials, as poorly constructed as they were, are still more credible than your mock psychology bona fides.
"You are the son of an incestuous union." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0Bst6OXEUg

playing outside
User avatar
Posts: 6170
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:36 am
Location: London, UK

Postby i_have_shiny_shoes » Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:40 pm

Please provide proof positive where latent psychosis has been described as "extreme."


Hmmmm. There must be one example in 83,000 results. Please post it when you find it, Soda.
we're discussing it, so it's not secret.

Stew Ingredient
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:57 pm

Postby Rosie Redux » Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:48 pm

is there a difference between an extreme latent psychosis, psychosis that is extremely latent and a latent psychosis that is extreme?

Inquiring minds would like to know.

playing outside
User avatar
Posts: 6170
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:36 am
Location: London, UK

Postby i_have_shiny_shoes » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:14 pm

Latent psychosis can most definitely become extreme - above you'll find about 83,000 examples.


Soda, I do believe the onus is on you to prove your assertion. Not one of the examples you've listed above concerns the condition of latent psychosis becoming extreme, so at present you would appear to be in the wrong. I'm still waiting. So prove it, or withdraw it. If there's 83,000 examples, you'll find on very easily, won't you?

I notice you are very unwilling to address the fact that Ian insist on searching for "extreme latent psychosis" despite the fact that I neither used that term in that form.


I did within the thread itself, if you remember. There's very little need for me to repeat myself.
we're discussing it, so it's not secret.

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 7685
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Postby Moethebartender » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:34 pm

i_have_shiny_shoes wrote:
Please provide proof positive where latent psychosis has been described as "extreme."


Hmmmm. There must be one example in 83,000 results. Please post it when you find it, Soda.


You have to google the phrase in Finnish - it shows up on the same website that 'despotic theory' appears on.


Funny that soda was so "keen to meet up" with someone he thinks has "extreme latent psychosis" that he's been posting about it for months after he was snubbed.
A Straylian wit on the presidential election wrote: You've gone from chimp to orangutan in your evolutionary political process. I hope to live long enough to witness the rise of homo sensibilus in Amerikkka.

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 7685
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Postby Moethebartender » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:51 pm

Soda 2.0 wrote:Moe -

The discussion about latent psychosis rambled on for perhaps 100 - 120 comments.

Not one disputed you my labelling you psychotic.


soda, I don't know if you recognize the irony of you trying to make that point on a 12 page thread (one of several threads, actually) devoted to pointing out that you are a compulsive lying cunt, but I found it amusing.
A Straylian wit on the presidential election wrote: You've gone from chimp to orangutan in your evolutionary political process. I hope to live long enough to witness the rise of homo sensibilus in Amerikkka.

Evil Overlord
User avatar
Posts: 7853
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:25 am
Location: Soooooo Inside Your Head (TM)

Postby Ian_in_DC » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:57 pm

Soda 2.0 wrote:You're psychotic - you don't laugh, you just choke in a different register.

Wow, my IIQ meter just went haywire. For someone who creates a multitude of mock biographies because he's ashamed of his rather mediocre credentials, Soda sure employs "projection" as a tactic frequently.
"You are the son of an incestuous union." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0Bst6OXEUg

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 21676
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:53 pm
Location: Heaven 5.3.07

Postby cowtown » Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:04 pm

mutha is fixing
Jim-2012 wrote:I *heart* Hitler



Image

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 8506
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 9:14 am
Location: Just south of the South Pole

Postby simon_in_exile » Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:08 pm

I think The Log is stored somewhere within this thread.
In an extreme situation, maybe it could be found using a latent google search.
La ruta nos aportó otro paso natural.

Evil Overlord
User avatar
Posts: 7853
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:25 am
Location: Soooooo Inside Your Head (TM)

Postby Ian_in_DC » Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:10 pm

simon_in_exile wrote:I think The Log is stored somewhere within this thread.
In an extreme situation, maybe it could be found using a latent google search.

The Log WAS posted here but Eric deleted it because it revealed him to be the fish-porn culprit.
"You are the son of an incestuous union." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0Bst6OXEUg

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 131
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:18 pm
Location: UK

Postby Cogito » Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:20 pm

Fish porn?
ergo... um...

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 21676
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:53 pm
Location: Heaven 5.3.07

Postby cowtown » Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:24 pm

mutha is fixing
Jim-2012 wrote:I *heart* Hitler



Image

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 21676
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:53 pm
Location: Heaven 5.3.07

Postby cowtown » Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:26 pm

Cogito wrote:Fish porn?



Fish porn was another stew incident, disco Danni went on a bender and enlightened us to a new type of porn and yes, its was probably about what you think, humans and fish and in unlogly union
Jim-2012 wrote:I *heart* Hitler



Image

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 131
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:18 pm
Location: UK

Postby Cogito » Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:27 pm

I wasn't aware fish had the necessary orifices. Edewkayshun here today.
ergo... um...

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 21676
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:53 pm
Location: Heaven 5.3.07

Postby cowtown » Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:33 pm

mutha is fixing
Jim-2012 wrote:I *heart* Hitler



Image

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 8506
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 9:14 am
Location: Just south of the South Pole

Postby simon_in_exile » Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:35 pm

I completely missed that. There truly is nothing like a Dane...
La ruta nos aportó otro paso natural.

the Secret Sauce
User avatar
Posts: 24028
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:46 pm
Location: El Norte

Postby section8 » Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:36 pm

'Tis true. Halibut are rumored to have kept some lonely fishermen company on long legs at sea.
My revolutionary farmer friend once labeled me as "severely creative." Yes, yes, I like tall-bike building and riding, making fermented foods, wild-crafting and being silent in places where there are no human sounds.

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 7685
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Postby Moethebartender » Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:36 pm

Cogito wrote:I wasn't aware fish had the necessary orifices. Edewkayshun here today.


Dani must have had an extremely small unit.

Coincidentally, soda was upset about dani being banned...

Ian wrote:Wow, my IIQ meter just went haywire. For someone who creates a multitude of mock biographies because he's ashamed of his rather mediocre credentials, Soda sure employs "projection" as a tactic frequently.


No shit.
A Straylian wit on the presidential election wrote: You've gone from chimp to orangutan in your evolutionary political process. I hope to live long enough to witness the rise of homo sensibilus in Amerikkka.

Stew Ingredient
Posts: 6640
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:32 pm

Postby tph24601 » Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:58 pm

Soda 2.0 wrote:IHSS -

Latent psychosis can most definitely become extreme - above you'll find about 83,000 examples.

it's pretty useless to get though all the nonsense, but I would have to say the logic of saying the 81000 or 83000 search results are all examples of Latent psychosis can be classified as extreme is quite flawed

but then again, it is soda logic.......

Evil Overlord
User avatar
Posts: 7853
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:25 am
Location: Soooooo Inside Your Head (TM)

Postby Ian_in_DC » Wed Feb 20, 2008 6:49 pm

Shhh. Don't tell Soda that latent means existing in a dormant or unconscious form. And once it becomes "extreme" it ceases to be latent. WWDD (What would Derrida do?)
"You are the son of an incestuous union." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0Bst6OXEUg

Evil Overlord
User avatar
Posts: 7853
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:25 am
Location: Soooooo Inside Your Head (TM)

Postby Ian_in_DC » Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:56 pm

UYG....

We gotta keep this "gem" as part of the historical record.
"You are the son of an incestuous union." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0Bst6OXEUg

Evil Overlord
User avatar
Posts: 7853
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:25 am
Location: Soooooo Inside Your Head (TM)

Postby Ian_in_DC » Fri Feb 22, 2008 7:55 pm

Soda 2.0 wrote:So this quote would be quite correct then, wouldn't it -

"his latent psychosis has become so extreme..."

No, it wouldn't be correct, dear boy. Once it becomes extreme, it ceases to be latent and becomes overt psychosis - "latent" and "extreme" are mutually exclusive. You would have stated that Moe's psychosis was so extreme or at least caveated it with verb illustrating change like "progressed." Please do try to keep up.

Then again, I guess being a Moldovan, English isn't your native tongue anyways.
"You are the son of an incestuous union." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0Bst6OXEUg

Evil Overlord
User avatar
Posts: 7853
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:25 am
Location: Soooooo Inside Your Head (TM)

Postby Ian_in_DC » Tue Feb 26, 2008 1:41 pm

UYG.

Notice how Soda on pages 7-9 claims that this is a completely fabricated CV. It takes several days - after Soda discredits the entire work as ficticious - before he "discovers" that his name and address are correct.

[When does this get put in Famous Dishes?]
"You are the son of an incestuous union." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0Bst6OXEUg

Blue Eyed Devil
User avatar
Posts: 3244
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 5:13 am

Postby blueeyes_austin » Tue Feb 26, 2008 2:44 pm

Ian_in_DC wrote:UYG.

Notice how Soda on pages 7-9 claims that this is a completely fabricated CV. It takes several days - after Soda discredits the entire work as ficticious - before he "discovers" that his name and address are correct.

[When does this get put in Famous Dishes?]


The thing I am wondering is, if it was fictitious and agents unknown put it up to discredit Soda's good name:

How did it get disappeared?

The only explanation that makes sense is that Soda put it up...and Soda removed it.
"We shall cause a distortionary response in US fiscal policy! God is great! God is great!"--Electrolyte channeling the 9/11 hijackers

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 5969
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 1:05 am
Location: Bay Area -- SF, CA (Don't even think of calling it 'Frisco.')

Postby Wilster » Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:08 pm

Soda 2.0 wrote:So this quote would be quite correct then, wouldn't it -


Another SoDuhism; "quite" correct? C'mon...there's been a few others in this very thread.
My moniker is Wilster. How is my posting?

Call 1-800-EAT-SHIT

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 5969
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 1:05 am
Location: Bay Area -- SF, CA (Don't even think of calling it 'Frisco.')

Postby Wilster » Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:20 pm

Wilster wrote:
Soda 2.0 wrote:Moe, whose latent (sic) psychosis has become so extreme (sic)...


SoDunce, I'm sorry I started this whole thing with your inability to write English, make a concise logically statement. I may be confused here; is SoDuh trying to promote that he understands English, or is he soliciting that he needs help with the latter?
My moniker is Wilster. How is my posting?

Call 1-800-EAT-SHIT

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 20783
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:21 pm
Location: Redmond,Wa

Postby judik » Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:21 pm

This OP is growing on me
You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried everything else.

Winston Churchill

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 5969
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 1:05 am
Location: Bay Area -- SF, CA (Don't even think of calling it 'Frisco.')

Postby Wilster » Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:28 pm

Soda 2.0 wrote:
I'm sorry I started this whole thing with your inability to write English, make a concise logically statement.


After that sentence, I think you should be sorry, bauble.


Really SoDunce? Any worse than this one:

Soda 2.0 wrote:You're a fucking imbecile, Wilster. Really, there are rodents out there who coule whip you at scrabble.

The bed frames were made of wood - that is what we slept on.


Okay, I could lean towards giving you the benefit of the doubt on the typo (even though you have not been so generous), but hey ol' bean, "Scrabble" is clearly capitalized and really SoDense, you never end a sentence with a preposition. Sure, we may do it with the spoken language, but not the written.

*this has been free English language tip for SoDuh number 237*
My moniker is Wilster. How is my posting?

Call 1-800-EAT-SHIT

Stew Ingredient
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:52 pm

Postby AnniesCat » Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:33 pm

Soda 2.0 wrote:
you never end a sentence with a preposition.


Oh. My. God.


Unreal. Wilster is as thick as cow shit, confirmed.
Zara: "mods, have them remove the avatar or remove my original logo artwork from the stew forum site and my handle from this membership. "

Stew Ingredient
Posts: 1033
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:34 pm
Location: England

Postby Daejn » Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:41 pm

Soda wrote:Often what looks like a preposition in an English sentence is really not a preposition but a part of the verb (the technical term is adverbial particle). Consider these verbs: to put, to put up, to put up with. Obviously these are not the same verbs, and equally obviously the words that look like familiar prepositions are actually a part of each of the last two verbs.


Fascinating.

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 5969
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 1:05 am
Location: Bay Area -- SF, CA (Don't even think of calling it 'Frisco.')

Postby Wilster » Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:43 pm

Soda 2.0 wrote:Wilster -

If you were a native speaker, you'd have known this, but since you aren't...

Often what looks like a preposition in an English sentence is really not a preposition but a part of the verb (the technical term is adverbial particle). Consider these verbs: to put, to put up, to put up with. Obviously these are not the same verbs, and equally obviously the words that look like familiar prepositions are actually a part of each of the last two verbs.

Do you really want to be so "correct" as to complain, "That is the sort of thing up with which I will not put!" (Winston Churchill once used a similar remark to mock someone who had criticized him for ending a sentence with a preposition.)

http://grammartips.homestead.com/prepositions1.html


For a super hero, you sure do make a strong case for finally realizing that your "latent/extreme" remark early in this thread really kinda discounted your thoughts on being a writer. Although, I'm sure there might be a spot for you as an ESL teacher; you should send out your CV one of these days and see how many hits you may get.

And *shudder* no penis talk; you're getting a lot better.
My moniker is Wilster. How is my posting?

Call 1-800-EAT-SHIT

Blue Eyed Devil
User avatar
Posts: 3244
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 5:13 am

Postby blueeyes_austin » Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:45 pm

Soda 2.0 wrote:Wilster -

If you were a native speaker, you'd have known this, but since you aren't...

Often what looks like a preposition in an English sentence is really not a preposition but a part of the verb (the technical term is adverbial particle). Consider these verbs: to put, to put up, to put up with. Obviously these are not the same verbs, and equally obviously the words that look like familiar prepositions are actually a part of each of the last two verbs.

Do you really want to be so "correct" as to complain, "That is the sort of thing up with which I will not put!" (Winston Churchill once used a similar remark to mock someone who had criticized him for ending a sentence with a preposition.)

http://grammartips.homestead.com/prepositions1.html


Fascinating and not his words, of course. A direct quote from the site.
"We shall cause a distortionary response in US fiscal policy! God is great! God is great!"--Electrolyte channeling the 9/11 hijackers

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 5969
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 1:05 am
Location: Bay Area -- SF, CA (Don't even think of calling it 'Frisco.')

Postby Wilster » Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:46 pm

Daejn wrote:
Soda wrote:Often what looks like a preposition in an English sentence is really not a preposition but a part of the verb (the technical term is adverbial particle). Consider these verbs: to put, to put up, to put up with. Obviously these are not the same verbs, and equally obviously the words that look like familiar prepositions are actually a part of each of the last two verbs.


Fascinating.


Equally fascinating is that SoDense makes no effort to highlight the above passage as NOT being his. No quotes, no italics, no nothin'.
My moniker is Wilster. How is my posting?

Call 1-800-EAT-SHIT

Blue Eyed Devil
User avatar
Posts: 3244
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 5:13 am

Postby blueeyes_austin » Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:47 pm

Wilster wrote:
Daejn wrote:
Soda wrote:Often what looks like a preposition in an English sentence is really not a preposition but a part of the verb (the technical term is adverbial particle). Consider these verbs: to put, to put up, to put up with. Obviously these are not the same verbs, and equally obviously the words that look like familiar prepositions are actually a part of each of the last two verbs.


Fascinating.


Equally fascinating is that SoDense makes no effort to highlight the above passage as NOT being his. No quotes, no italics, no nothin'.


Well, of course. That's Soda's MO--a complete lack of academic (or any other) integrity.
"We shall cause a distortionary response in US fiscal policy! God is great! God is great!"--Electrolyte channeling the 9/11 hijackers

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 20783
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:21 pm
Location: Redmond,Wa

Postby judik » Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:47 pm

He can't seem to help himself
He deserves our pity,not our ridicule!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried everything else.

Winston Churchill

Stew Ingredient
User avatar
Posts: 5969
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 1:05 am
Location: Bay Area -- SF, CA (Don't even think of calling it 'Frisco.')

Postby Wilster » Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:51 pm

blueeyes_austin wrote:Well, of course. That's Soda's MO--a complete lack of academic (or any other) integrity.


To quote one of the most admired posters here, I think SoDuh was "frothing at the mouth," squirming in his seat, not able to type "preposition + sentence + end" into Google fast enough.
My moniker is Wilster. How is my posting?

Call 1-800-EAT-SHIT

Blue Eyed Devil
User avatar
Posts: 3244
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 5:13 am

Postby blueeyes_austin » Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:51 pm

Oh, by the way, I'm glad Rosie saved this:

Ian (USA) is charged by The Soda (EU) with having made a series of boring statements about The Sodas origins and family, and is now asked to present evidence to back up those claims. Th court would also like to ask Moe (USA) to back-up said claims, and he may give evidence of Ian's behalf.

Whilst Ian's lawyers still argue against the death penalty, the court will order that as his claims are proven groundless, he will acknowledge that he is wrong, and to apologise to the forum for lying.

If he refuses to apologise, the case will end, and Ian will never get to see any of the evidence he so craves.

In return, I will post whatever personal info is necessary to refute Ian's claims.


You asked for it, bucko.
"We shall cause a distortionary response in US fiscal policy! God is great! God is great!"--Electrolyte channeling the 9/11 hijackers

PreviousNext

Return to Famous Dishes

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests